Journal article
Mandy Simons, David I. Beaver, Craige Roberts, Judith Tonhauser
2017
2017
Semantic Scholar
DOI
Cite
Cite
APA
Click to copy
Simons, M., Beaver, D. I., Roberts, C., & Tonhauser, J. (2017). The Best Question: Explaining the Projection Behavior of Factives. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2016.1150660
Chicago/Turabian
Click to copy
Simons, Mandy, David I. Beaver, Craige Roberts, and Judith Tonhauser. “The Best Question: Explaining the Projection Behavior of Factives” (2017).
MLA
Click to copy
Simons, Mandy, et al. The Best Question: Explaining the Projection Behavior of Factives. 2017, doi:10.1080/0163853X.2016.1150660.
BibTeX Click to copy
@article{mandy2017a,
title = {The Best Question: Explaining the Projection Behavior of Factives},
year = {2017},
doi = {10.1080/0163853X.2016.1150660},
author = {Simons, Mandy and Beaver, David I. and Roberts, Craige and Tonhauser, Judith}
}
Abstract
This article deals with projection in factive sentences. The article first challenges standard assumptions by presenting a series of detailed observations about the interpretations of factive sentences in context, showing that what implication projects, if any, is quite variable and that projection is tightly constrained by prosodic and contextual information about the alternatives under consideration. The article then proposes an account which accommodates the variability of the data and sensitivity to contextual alternatives. The account is formulated within a modified version of Roberts 1996/2012 question-based model of discourse.
